Minggu, 01 April 2012

The Criteria of International Level of Educational Practice Adapted From Paul Ernest




There are many views about Mathematics learning in school. However, there are many theories that it is less appropriate when applied at the international level. In this time we will learn about the criterias of international level of educational practice, adapted from Paul Ernest. There are nine views of this criterias.
The first is about the nature of Mathematics. Paul Ernest said that mathematics are a body of knowledge, science of truth, structure of truth, and social activity. Mathematics is a science that contains a truth. Further Ebbut and Straker (in Marsigit, 2009) expressed the essence of mathematics as follows:
-       Mathematics is a search for patterns and relationship
-       Mathematics is a creative activity, involving imagination, intuition and discovery
-       Mathematics is a way of solving problems
-       Mathematics is a means of communicating information or ideas
The second is the value of Mathematics. In general, values ​​influence attitudes and behavior of someone on something. About the moral value in the mathematics learning, people often look at the good side or bad side.  Value  includes consideration of the elements that bring an individual ideas about what is right, good, or desirable. Just like a pragmatic theory which states that the truth of a statement of the criteria measured by whether the statement is functional in practical life. It is mean that a statement is true, if the statement or the consequences of that statement has practical uses for human life.
The third is about society's view of education. Nowadays people begin to realize the importance of an education. In the era of globalization, they must have adequate education in order not to lag behind other segments of society. In this case mathematics education is also experiencing the impact of globalization. Need a few changes in it, especially in the face of society's view that more advanced, and embrace a belief system. People are starting to think about humanity, freedom, justice, and democracy. This is what should bring a change in the mathematics learning such as how to develop and manage the knowledge, teaching, learning, and schooling.
The fourth is about learning theory. In mathematics education, it is known as a constructivist learning paradigm. Constructivism paradigm states that mathematics as a fallible human activity, not a collection of the external correct absolute structure to the human. Mathematical truth and the truth of mathematical objects must be realized as a result of construction or how to construct. Constructivism holds the opinion that every world experience, depending on the context and unique and can not  be accessed by other individuals. Piaget (Sugihartono, 2007) suggests that cognitive development is not an accumulation of separate pieces of information, but rather is the construction of a mental framework by the students to understand their environment, so students are free to construct their own understanding. The principles of constructivism in learning including the following:
1.      Understanding is built by the students themselves both personally and socially,
2.      Knowledge can not be transferred from teacher to student, but only with the liveliness of the students themselves to reason,
3.      Students actively construct continuously so that it always changes the concept towards the concept of a more detailed, complete, and in accordance with scientific concepts
4.       Teachers act as facilitators.
The fifth is the nature of students and students ability. Every student are different from other students, this is what makes them unique. In a learning process every student has different motivation, intelligence, emotions, backgrounds, and circumstances of psychology. Level of maturity among students in the classroom is different, so the teacher must be able to overcome the psychological state of a variety of students in the learning process. Characteristics of effective learning are when learning process can respond to special needs students (Sugihartono, 2007: 28).   In one class, each student has different ability in learning. There are a high and low ability to understand the material. Teachers should pay attention to it. How to cope with students who have such low capacity, motivate and help when experiencing difficulties in learning. So that students are able to catch up.
The sixth is the nature of teaching learning of Mathematics. On mathematics learning, most teachers still use the teacher-centered system. So that students are not given the opportunity to grow and develop the knowledge, because in the learning process teacher has a full role. Mathematics learning system should be centered on the students. Students are allowed to build their own knowledge, so they will grow as expected, without any coercion. Here the teacher acts as facilitator in the learning and facilitate students when encountering learning difficulties. Teachers also need to understand the learning styles of each student, whether auditory, visual or kinesthetic. In order to implement appropriate learning styles and poses no boredom in class.
The seventh is the nature of teaching learning resources. Learning resources can be everything around us. In mathematics we are learning to use the teaching aid to facilitate students in understanding the material. The use of the board, reference books, the internet and calculators can also facilitate the learning process. Related to the resources of teaching, Ernest (1991, in Marsigit 2009) suggested that due to the learning should be active, varied, socially engaged and self-regulating, the theory of resources has three main components :
1.      the provision of a wide variety of practical resources to facilitate the varied and active teaching approaches;
2.      the provision of authentic material, such as newspaper, official statistics, and so on for socially relevant and socially engaged study and investigation; and
3.      the facilitation of student self-regulated control and access to learning resources.
The eighth is Assessment. Assessment is any systematic procedure for collecting information that can be used to make inferences about the characteristics of people or objects. Assessment can and should provide information that both enhances instruction and promotes learning (Reynolds, 2010). The function of the Assessment are to: 1) Describe the extent a student has mastered a competency. 2) Evaluating student learning outcomes in order to help students understand themselves, make decisions about next steps, both for the selection of programs, personality development. 3) Finding it difficult to learn and the possibility of student achievement that can be developed. 4) Find the weakness and lack of an ongoing learning process in order to improve subsequent learning process. 5) Controls for teachers and schools on the progress of students' progress.
The ninth is the diversity. In  mathematics learning in the classroom, we not only face the same students, but also the diverse students. They not only come from one culture, but also from different cultures. We must implement a system of multiculturalism in learning. Moreover, taking the theme of learning should not also mention specific ethnic. Capture the theme can be widely and do not depend on local culture.



Sources:
Marsigit. 2009. Philosophy of Mathematics Education. Retrieved:
Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, Victor. 2010. Measurement and
Assessment in Education Second Edition. New Jersey: Pearson.
Sugihartono, dkk. 2007. Psikologi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press.

Senin, 26 Maret 2012

HOW TO DEVELOP THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENTIONAL OF LIFE IN MATHEMATICS EDUCATION


To improve our ability in mathematics education, we need to learn a variety of mathematical learning systems from different countries. That way we will have a broad view of mathematics education and we can apply the appropriate learning system when we become a teacher someday. One way is  watching a video about the lesson study in Japan. This video is about mathematics learning in grade 3 elementary schools in Japan about the multiplication algorithm.
The video shows how to solve a mathematics problem on the multiplication of numbers. First time, the teacher writes a problem on the blackboard and explained the problem to the students. Students are left to guess the intent of the question and let them started to think.
Then,  the teacher gives an illustration by using a paper containing the image of circle in  three rows, and each row contains 23 circles. They were asked to count the number of the existing circle. Then the teacher provided the illustrations for each student. Students are required to solve these problems in their own way and they were given a few minutes to complete. Teachers not only stay waiting  their work, but also he went around the classroom to check  and help them.
 After a few minutes, the teacher provides the opportunity for students to present their work. One by one they put forward their work. While the students' talk, the teacher wrote their work on the board so that all students in the classroom can be more clearly what is their friends talk about.
They do many ways in finding the answers to multiplication 23 to 3. The first way, they were devides the first line into two parts, the 20 circles and 3 circles. Then multiply each part by 3, so 20 times 3, and 3 times 3. Then the result of the multiplication are summed to get  60 +9 = 69.
The second is to likens the number 2 at 23 as a 10-yen coin, so 2 multiplied by 3 and we get the 6, and 3 multiplied by 3 equal to 9. Then, because two are assumed as 10-yen coin, so 6 is multiplied by 10 and the result is 60. Finally, add 60 with 9 and get 69 as the results.
Most of students doing their works by using the first approach. They assess the first approach is more effective in multiplying 23 times 3. But some students are arguing with each other even though they are the same answers. There is also another way to approach the answer but instead to explain the confusion.Alpha
Some of students use the way that has been given by a teacher at a previous meeting. So, there are no a lot of difficulties. The arguments they made were grounded on the concept that they have received at previous meetings.
After several minutes of discussion, and some students have submitted their work. Blackboard was already full with the results of their work. Finally, the teacher gives the conclusions of the problems that have been granted. The teacher explains the correct and effective steps and appropriate solutions to these problems.
From the video, it can be concluded that the learning of mathematics at grade 3 elementary schools in Japan is use a system of learning with problem-solving methods.
There are many positive and negative values ​​that we can take from this video.  The positive values that we can take from this video are teachers provide opportunities for students to find solutions of by their own way , train the thinking skills of each student, train speech ability and express their statement to the other student, train the confidence of each student, and student become more active in the classroom. While the negative side of this footage is the teacher does not allow students to explain their answers in front of  the class. So they just talk not do something. Sometimes the teacher is also confusion with their answers, so that often cut their conversation. Maybe in a way like it will save time and learning process do not take a long time.
Although done in that way, the learning system was considered appropriate in the learning of mathematics in primary schools. Because the teacher was actively involve students in the learning process. The teacher is seen as a facilitator who is ready to facilitate students in learning. The learning process is no longer centered on teachers, but student-centered. Students must be active in the learning process. Students are expected to solve math problems in their own way without any compulsion to use a particular method. There is no compulsion in learning, so that they can construct their own knowledge in their own way.
In addition students also need to be given a challenging problem, but not too difficult, so that students have a strong will to solve them. According Hermenberger & Reichel (in Posamentier, 1996:201): Students must have various opportunities to get down to easier problems themselves so that they get a chance to think about them and to develop solutions themselves (maybe with some minor hints).
If we do not provide a big  opportunity for students, it would mean that we are still of the view centered teachers. If so the atmosphere of the class will be dominated by teachers and students do not understand the lesson. It is reminded by Umran Inan (in Plooster, 1997:1) says: "The worst thing that can happen is to go along through a full hour without any questions. That might mean two things: a very remote possibility that you are extremely clear, but more often than not that you are not clear at all."


Sources:
Plooster, N. 1997. Teaching Tips for TAs: 10 Suggestions for Teaching Problem Solving. California: TA Development Program, University of California.
Posamentier, A. S. & Stepelman, J. 1996. Teaching Secondary School Mathematics, techniques & enrichment units. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.