In
the era of globalization and the increasingly sophisticated technologies require an
individual to have different abilities
and skills more
than other. Not
only in economic or
cultural course, but also education
is very important. Creativity and
problem solving skills are very necessary
in the face of this globalization era. One
means to improve the creative
and problem-solving abilities in the field of education is through the learning of mathematics. However, the learning of
mathematics were frequently
encountered problems. Some problems in
developing an international level of teaching
learning of mathematics
are as follows:
-
Low
competitiveness at the international level, for example in the Olympics
-
The low
average value of UNAS (National Final
Exam)
-
The low
interest in learning and achievement among students learn mathematics
-
Submission of
material that is less attractive from teacher to student
-
Low quality
studies supporting books
Some
of the above are examples
of common problems in developing an
international level of teaching learning of
mathematics.
Problems
of low achievement
and student interest
in learning math because Mathematics learning in Indonesia
is still dominated by the exercises are basic.
It is not go into mathematics as a whole. Most teachers only explain a
mathematical concept which only
emphasized the importance
of numeracy skills, algorithmic steps, and
the memorization of formulas. This is why the students only get the basics
mathematical skill.
If
we linked to the
internationalization of mathematics education, the achievement of basic skills is not
enough. Mathematics learning,
now and in the
future, can not rest only on achieving basic skills,
but instead should be designed to achieve a high
level of mathematical competence (Parwati: 2008).
If the teacher is
still at the stage of explaining
mathematical basics skills course, students
most likely will just remain there.
In
this globalization era as much as possible the teacher should be
able to answer a variety of challenges
at the international level. If the
teacher remains at
its foundation, traditional in nature, how they can develop
and compete internationally.
How could they make competent students in mathematics?
The
next problem is
the lack of teachers’ creativity
in teaching. Most teachers are still fixated on the
available curriculum. They only
teach what is written in the
syllabus. Most of them seldom add material
that is actually very important but not listed in the syllabus.
Lack of teachers’ creativity in
teaching demonstrated in the number of teachers who are still fixated on the
material in the textbook for teaching materials. It also resulted in the
ability of teachers to provide a question in the test. They are still hooked to
the textbook. As a result, they give a question for test similar to the
examples problem in the textbook. Furthermore, in providing a mathematical
problem, teachers often assign only one correct answer. In addition students
are also required to answer the questions given in accordance with what has
been previously demonstrated by the teacher.
The
above shows the teaching-learning process is still teacher centered. Teachers still
dominate the teaching and learning
activities. Also according to Marpaung
(in repository.upi.edu) students are almost never given a chance to try
out their own strategies to solve problems and the teacher did not
dare to take decisions that are in the interest of the class curriculum. It
can be concluded that the learning
of mathematics in schools still require innovations
that demands creativity of teachers in improving learning strategies.
Learning
process in schools should be used students centered
system. Here the teacher
is not as central
to the learning process, the teacher
only as a facilitator and dynamic factor. All
processes should be centered to
student learning. Students are
faced with a problem
and they are required to complete it in accordance with their own creativity.
Many ways and
methods that can be develop creative skills in
learning mathematics. One way is
to apply the learning model
based on creative
problem solving. This learning
model is expected to be able to
nurture creative skills and problem solving skills through the habit of thinking and being creative in understanding and solving mathematical
problems. In the end the habit of
thinking and being creative will have a
positive effect on student
behavior in the face of their
daily lives (repository.upi.edu :
2009). One way to improve the creativity
of students in the study is to provide
an open-ended problem.
The presentation of open-ended problems
will be able to train students to think of
creativity as a problem presented requires students to think about the possibility of correct answers (Shimada, S., 1997).
The
next problem is
the lack of books for math
investigations. Most of the books in circulation has a very low quality, because many books were
written by people that do not involve a
skilled person in mathematics education or mathematics teacher. As a result of the outstanding books do not meet the
qualifications specified by the school. So, a teacher needs to develop students
worksheets or LKS. LKS contains a summary of the
material and practice questions that are routinely
made by the teachers themselves.
By making the exercises by their own, teachers can
determine the levels of difficulty of the questions
that correspond to the ability of students. By using LKS, a teacher could develop questions
that are open-ended problem that not
only to measured students' ability
to calculate, but
also hone their
creativity. The
books such as those
described above can be used
as a complement to learning (Parwati,
2008).
Developing
competencies in creative thinking among students is very important in this
era of global competition,
because the complexity of the problems in all aspects of modern
life is increasing.
Ability to think creatively considered a high order
competencies and can be viewed
as a continuation of basic competence
(commonly referred to as learning
basic skills in
mathematics) (Sudiarta: 2010).
REFERENCES:
Parwati, Ni Nyoman. 2008. Analisis Kebutuhan Pengembangan Model
Pembelajaran Matematika Berpendekatan Tematik Berorientasi Pemecahan Masalah
Terbuka pada Sekolah Dasar di Provinsi
Bali, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran UNDIKSHA, Oktober 2008
repository.upi.edu
Shimada, S. & Becker, P., 1997. The
Open-Ended Approach: A New Proposal for Teaching Mathematics. NY: NCTM.
Sudiarta, I G. P.
2010. Pengembangan Pembelajaran Berpendekatan Tematik Berorientasi Pemecahan
Masalah Matematika Terbuka untuk Mengembangkan Kompetensi
Berpikir Divergen, Kritis dan Kreatif, Jurnal Pendidikan dan
Pengajaran UNDIKSHA.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar